Pottery shard strengthens case for David’s kingdom
A pottery shard uncovered in an archaeological dig in Israel’s Elah Valley (which lies between Jerusalem and Tel Aviv roughly in the area of the modern city of Beit Shemesh) may provide important information in the ongoing academic dispute over whether or not the Biblical account of the Holy Land’s history can be considered accurate.
The shard’s inscription is earliest known Hebrew writing, the University of Haifa’s Prof. Gershon Galil says. The inscription itself was written in ink on a 15 cm X 16.5 cm trapezoid pottery shard. The inscription will likely become part of the academic debate over whether the kingdom of King David existed.
In recent decades, different schools of archaeology have battled over the “historicity” of the Bible, whether or not it can be considered a reliable source of information. Those who say it is unreliable–called Biblical Minimalists–have been ascendant (and they have focused especially on David and the 10th century BCE). Some recent discoveries have called their theories into question, though, including the large stone structure unearthed by archaeologist Eilat Mazar, which she believes is King David’s palace.
While people of faith won’t be moved by whether or not academics believe in the veracity of the Biblical account, the ongoing research not only affects many unsure of their beliefs. It also profoundly affects attempts by Palestinians to erase Jewish claims to the Holy Land.
Comments (0) »Sunday, January 10th, 2010 at 9:12 AM | Stand For Israel
More on attempts to erase Biblical history

The Temple Mount with the new city behind it (by David Hoaks)
Rabbi Leibel Reznick is writing from a Jewish perspective, but the Palestinian attempts to erase Biblical history are trying to erase Christian history as well:
In his 1925 autobiography, Mein Kampf, Adolph Hitler wrote that people would assume that an outrageous lie must be true because no one would have the audacity to have made it up. Later, that propaganda technique evolved into: If a big lie is repeated enough times it will become widely accepted as truth.
This bit of Nazi propaganda is being used today by the Palestinians. Their Big Lie is preached from the pulpits of the mosques and in the classrooms of their madrasas – and more and more of the untutored masses are believing it.
What is the Palestinian Big Lie? Palestinian Authority Mufti Ikrama Sabri was quoted in the Palestinian daily Al-Ayyam (November 22, 1997) as saying that the Western Wall is part of the Al-Aksa Mosque and the Jews have no connection with it. …
In other words, the Jewish people have no historical connection with the Temple Mount, including the Western Wall, or with any part of old Jerusalem. No archaeological evidence has ever shown otherwise. So they claim.
Read the rest here.
Comments (2) »Monday, November 9th, 2009 at 1:50 PM | Stand For Israel
There they go again…

Elaborate forgeries...
This time, a senior PLO official and a Palestinian historian are denying that the Jewish people have any historical connection to the land of Israel at all. (The Bible? Apparently, a very well-planned forgery.)
In an interview on official PA television earlier this month, historian Nabil Alqam accused Israel of faking archaeological finds in order to manufacture Jewish history and blot out the “real” history, which he says shows Palestinian culture stretching back 4,000-5,000 years, reported the Jerusalem Post.
In addition to that, according to PLO Executive Committee Member Saleh Rafat, Israelis are also stealing Palestinian ”cuisine, clothing [and] architecture.” Rafat also denied that the holy Temples ever existed, dismissing the huge archaeological remains around Western Wall of the Temple as the remains of old aqueducts.
Denial is apparently also a river in… Palestine.
(The invaluable Palestinian Media Watch produced the report on the program.)
Comments (0) »Thursday, November 5th, 2009 at 5:06 PM | Stand For Israel

Helping erase Biblical history
We could hardly say it better than Commentary’s incomparable Evelyn Gordon on the dust-up over building in the “settlement” of Jerusalem”: