The U.N.’s moral bankruptcy

Ban Ki-moon, Secretary-General of the United Nations

Those who seek to undermine free, democratic societies must privately laugh at how easily we in the West are often tied in knots by our own moral obtuseness.

Navi Pillay, the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights (itself a caricature of its name) and the office of U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon released statements just before the Shalit trade happened expressing “concerns regarding reports that hundreds of Palestinian prisoners from the West Bank may be released to the Gaza Strip or abroad. If in some cases this has been without the free and informed consent of the concerned individuals, this may constitute forced transfer or deportation under international law.” He added, “we are not sure to what extent they consented to this.”

Allow me to summarize:

Under international law, it is illegal to forcibly transfer prisoners of war or send them to other countries. The U.N. is concerned that Israel may have “forcibly transferred” some of the terrorists to places they didn’t want to go. I’m sure you’re as concerned as I am.

Every convicted terrorist (remember, every one of these “detainees” has been convicted by a free and independent court) was privately interviewed by the International Committee of the Red Cross to assess their wishes pertaining to release. And what authority allowed those interviews to take place? That would be Israel.

Gilad Shalit was taken captive in a cross-border raid that took place on his own soil – a violation of international law. At the time of his kidnapping he was a uniformed soldier in his nation’s armed forces, thereby requiring his captors to meet certain standards of treatment under international law. He was held in a dungeon for more than five years and never saw the sun (and has the vitamin D deficiency to show for it) – a violation of international law. He never had access to the Red Cross as required by international law. His captors released a single video of him to prove that he was alive – and then only to maximize his trade-in value – which was also a violation of international law. You get the drift.

The U.N. statement refers to Gilad as a “prisoner” and describes his former condition as “detention” and, essentially, says the same about the released terrorists. Such tripe is as offensive as it is ridiculous. Gilad was a victim of an illegal kidnapping. The terrorists were arrested, tried, and convicted by the legal authority of the democratic and sovereign state of Israel. Under that warped line of thinking, the man who kidnapped Elizabeth Smart – now that he finds himself imprisoned – is in the same ethical and practical circumstance as the one Miss Smart found herself in during the commission of the crime.

The moral bankruptcy of the U.N. is perfectly illustrated here. One side (Hamas) is a serial violator of the law (actually, in order to violate the law, you’d have to first care about abiding by it). One side (Israel) complies with the letter and spirit of it – despite the fact that they invite recrimination, investigation, and condemnation from a world that largely has it in for them.

They’re laughing at us in Tehran. And Damascus. And Beijing. And Havana. And every other tyranny-soaked capital in the world.


Author: Rabbi Jonathan Greenberg | October 20, 2011


 

What do you think?

  • Pamela
    November 10, 2011
    10:30 am
     

    GET US OUT OF THE UN AND GET THE UN OUT OF THE US

    Reply to this comment »
  • Susan
    October 22, 2011
    11:28 pm
     

    I wish the US would withdraw from the UN and kick them out of our country. they have done nothing to deserve being call United Nations, they are useless and do more harm to those who pursue peace in our world. we should refuse to support them in any way and it makes me sick to think that our country lets them get away with all their lies.

    Reply to this comment »
  • James
    October 20, 2011
    6:45 pm
     

    I never hear anything so rediculous as a nation being considered breakers of the law by releasing legally convicted murderers to another country. Are they not glad to have them back?

    Reply to this comment »
  • goldie
    October 20, 2011
    5:48 pm
     

    man the un and my own leaders make me sick. you will find anything to try and put ISRAEL in a negative light no matter what good they do. they set free over a thousand terrorist to free 1 young jewish man. ISRAEL just keep your heads up and keep pressing forward. the world as a whole will never accept you .but those that belong to G_D love you because G_D taught us to love you in HIS word. g-d is your defender!!

    Reply to this comment »
  • debra
    October 20, 2011
    5:46 pm
     

    the people who control the u.n. are the ones in power,they have money and a home to go to…PROTECTION…well GODS ways are more powerfull,i cant see how these people sleep at night..not because of evil….but the power of GOD judgement,ill pray for ya all to wake up and be respectfull

    Reply to this comment »
  • Dennis
    October 20, 2011
    4:21 pm
     

    This once again demonstrates the moral bankruptcy of the UN that tolerates the killing of Israelis and blames the victims for their own murder. The UN ignores its own convention against genocide.

    Reply to this comment »
  • Dwight
    October 20, 2011
    3:49 pm
     

    It looks like there are some very educated idiots that have to think very, very hard to come up with new ways to legitimize their worth in an effort to keep their jobs and/or positions.

    Reply to this comment »

Share your comments

First Name:
Last Name: (Remains Private)
Email Address: (Remains Private)
What are your thoughts?
Read our Terms of Agreement

"informing, equipping and mobilizing individuals and churches to support the
State of Israel"

Archive

Jan  |   Feb  |   Mar  |   Apr  |   May  |   Jun
Jul  |   Aug  |   Sep  |   Oct  |   Nov  |   Dec
Jan  |   Feb  |   Mar  |   Apr  |   May  |   Jun
Jul  |   Aug  |   Sep  |   Oct  |   Nov  |   Dec

The Latest from
@TheFellowship

Loading...
Follow us on Twitter »